Handling that for a personal project would be difficult for me. There might be tools for merging issues and MR from multiple repositories but would that be a worthy time investment? I think not so an apples vs oranges comparison is a must for me. Right now I’m thinking releases would be duplicated to GitHub and code only in GitLab. Issues will be in 2 places but code will be in 1 at least this way. I have found a lot over youtube and other pages but for gitlab.com which brought me a lot of problems as they were not working as it was trying to connect to gitlab.com.
For teams that want to consolidate their tools, cut down on complexity, and build security into their development process from the start, it’s a fantastic choice. The integrated CI/CD, in particular, is a standout feature that can seriously speed up your delivery pipeline. In this GitLab overview, we’ll get into its core features, how it’s built, and what it costs. We’ll also look at the potential downsides of a «one-stop-shop,» especially when it comes to managing all the scattered knowledge your development team needs to get work done.
I was just looking for a way to do the same, but at the very least, you have not incorporated the deploy token username in your commands, which I expect would be compulsory. Still, I’ve had no success even when adding the deploy token username to the URL. Where GitLab vets open source projects manually (and annually), GitHub freely provides. Projects one writes would be more visible and can potentially be seen by more users / developers too. The «one-stop-shop» model’s main limitation is that some features might offer a «good enough» solution rather than a best-in-class one.
How do I download a single (small) file from my private gitlab repo? The one thing that requires a bit of setup in this solution is the mirroring. I think I’ve read there’s an option for that in GitLab, to push changes to GitHub automatically. If I have a repo in both locations, there might be issues and PR / MR from both places.
I try to git clone from my private-project on gitlab.com to local env.but authentication failed. You are both using deploy tokens, which are used for accessing the repository via git. They are basically some temporary access accounts for git. You made it very clear and I’ve been following the tutorial on setting up runners on my local device.
Anything Git-related, like cloning or pushing code, goes to a dedicated service called Gitaly. All the important data, like user info and issues, is stored in a PostgreSQL database. Launched way back in 2011, GitLab’s mission has always been about providing a single application for everything from planning and source code management to CI/CD, monitoring, and security. The idea is that instead of patching together a bunch of different tools, your team can manage its entire workflow in one spot. It started out with separate Community and Enterprise editions, but now GitLab uses a single, open-core codebase, unlocking different features depending on which pricing plan you’re on.
Figuring out the right one really depends on what your team needs for collaboration, security, and scale. This modular setup lets GitLab scale different parts of its service on their own, which is important for their big SaaS offering and for companies running large self-managed installations. GitLab’s big promise is to clean all that up by replacing the sprawling, complex setup with a single, unified DevSecOps platform.
This reduces https://traderoom.info/azure-github-gitlab-bitbucket-mass/ complexity, cuts down on context switching, and streamlines workflows by managing everything from planning to deployment in one place. A platform that does everything might only offer a «good enough» version of a feature, whereas a dedicated tool built for one job usually excels at it. GitLab’s features are split across three main plans.
KDE also completed its move to a self-hosted GitLab repository in mid-2020.
This is where a specialized tool can work alongside GitLab to create a much more productive environment. While GitLab is busy managing your code, an AI-powered internal assistant can manage your scattered knowledge. I have previously written to this repository, but that was to the branch main, before the first version of the software was put into production.
My env is under “forward authenticated proxy” for enterprise user.so, error message is Authentication error, but it’s SSL Certificatite error. Make sure that you have enabled write access for that Deploy key. With GitLab, if you projects will be storage intensive then you will hit the 5GB limit pretty quickly. Aside from storage and (depending on your choice) ownership, GitHub seems to provide more for free tiers. This is not a criticism of GitLab as I appreciate it exists but I’m trying to make an objective decision. A potential new user here and I’m curious if I should make the switch to GitLab as a newbie developer.
In this case the code is still hosted on GitLab but I will run the pipelines on my local device which is a great solution for CI. Storage limits still apply and for some projects it is fine. You might get prompted for username/password once on git clone . Add your username, and PAT (not your account password!) into the forms, when asked. You might get prompted for username/password once on git clone.
This GitLab overview suggests complementing GitLab with a specialized AI-powered internal assistant like eesel AI. This tool can unify scattered knowledge from sources like Confluence, Google Docs, and Slack, providing a single, intelligent source of truth for developers. If you’re building software, you know how quickly the toolchain can get out of hand. You might be using one tool for your code repos, another for CI/CD, a third for tracking issues, and a handful more for security scans and project management.
You can create a branch named “branch_old” from “branch”, and then delete the branch named “branch” . GitLab integrates security directly into the CI/CD pipeline, shifting security «left» to catch vulnerabilities early in the process. It includes features like SAST, DAST, container scanning, and secret detection, which are particularly prominent in the Ultimate tier. By adding a dedicated knowledge tool like eesel AI, you can fill in the gaps of GitLab’s «one-stop-shop» platform and fix the frustrating problem of internal developer support. These security features are a big part of the Ultimate tier, which is what makes GitLab a legitimate DevSecOps platform.
For what it’s worth, I had read that documentation but persisted in searching for a deploy token solution because personal access token scopes are overbroad for my use case, viz. Specifying a URI for a single file in a private repository. Instead of merely providing a GitLab URI, I’ll now need to deploy a laundry list of Azure resources in order to securely serve a single script to an ARM template. When you make a request to GitLab (either from your browser or a Git command), it goes through a web server to GitLab Workhorse, which is a smart reverse proxy. Web and API requests go to the main GitLab application, while background jobs like CI pipelines are handled by a service called Sidekiq.
En Olveira Arquitectura damos vida a tus ideas, creando espacios únicos que reflejan tu esencia y fortalecen las conexiones humanas. Descubre la arquitectura que cuenta historias.